22.02.2012 20:55, Ante Karamatic write: > On 16.02.2012 05:23, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > >> Newer versions of pacemaker and lrmd are able to deal with upstart >> resources via dbus. >> However I do not like this way, so please find resource-agent attached, >> which is able to manage arbitrary upstart job (just like Anything but >> for upstart resources). It already saved me much time and nerves >> managing libvirtd (with my own upstart job) which you probably already >> know always wants to SIGABRT (btw I even know the main reason for that >> and now testing patch which I will hopefully send to libvirt ml). > > But, you use 'initctl' in your OCF which also relies on dbus (libdbus, > to be correct; in both cases running dbus is not a requirement). Reason > why we didn't use initctl, grep, awk and company, when we developed the > upstart RAexec, was cause doing it that way was slower. And ugly :) > > I guess I'm just interested what do you find wrong or bad with how > current upstart RAexec is done?
I looked at that RAexec very early, just after it was commited, and I understand that it requires running dbus daemon to operate. I prefer to simplify operation chains, so that is really not an option for me to rely on one more service to do simple job. Did I miss something? Anyways, upstart is gone from Fedora, and will go away from EL7, so that all actually doesn't matter. Best, Vladislav _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
