On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:15:04PM +0200, Rasto Levrinc wrote: > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 2012-06-05T09:43:09, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > > > >> Every argument made so far applies equally to HAWK and the Linbit GUI, > >> yet there was no outcry when they were announced. > > > > No, like I said above, that did suck - but the architecture truly is > > different and drbd-mc just wasn't the right answer for customers who > > wanted a HTML-only frontend. Besides, this is not an outcry. An outcry > > is revoking people's mailing list privileges and posting angry blogs. > > ;-) > > Ok, I see the point of both sides, so I will not join the outcry. :) > > Just for the record, the drbd mc / lcmc as an applet and a little bit > backend could look like a web application, only better.
... once it is cleaned up to not try to use up a couple GB of RAM and loop in the GC, while the typical default browser plugin JVM settings allow for a handful of MB, max ... that cleanup may be useful anyways. ;) I still like LCMC. Lars _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org