On 2012-12-06T12:39:02, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > > [1] and it'd perhaps even be cleaner if, indeed, we had resource sets > > instead of groups, and could reference them as aggregates as well. But > > that may be a different discussion. > > I would very much like to ditch groups for sets, but there are still some > things I just can't get to work without the group pseudo resource.
What if the id of a resource set could be used as a reference in other constraints? The resource set would then implicitly become said "pseudo object". (This is moving away a bit from the original discussion.) -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
