On 2012-12-06T20:10:42, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
> > To be honest, *I* couldn't figure out what "failure-delegate" would mean
> > here. "So, the child delegates its failures to the parent as part of the
> > child being ordered after the parent? Uh? How's that making sense?"
> > ;-)
> No, its a resource (meta) attribute, not a constraint option.
> Any failures get delegated to the named resource.
>
> Am am at least heartened that Yan knew what I was talking about :)
;-) Still, the normal (to me, at least) thinking would be "OK, so the VM
is the container. And then a rsc running/being monitored within the
container *delegates* its failure upwards?" It does confuse me.
And, where you've lost me for a bit - are you know speaking up against
an attribute on the order constraint, or are you proposing something in
addition?
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
