No. I have subscribed as ssahu...@movik.com. But my thunderbird client
is still referring to my email id as "ssahu...@movik.net" (our domain
was recently changed from .com to .net, but my client is still referring
to the old one). I guess this could be the problem. Now I have changed
the setting, so hope this response with the list alias in cc will make
it to the mailing list.
Regards,
Shridhar
On 01/09/2013 04:39 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
It seems to be because you subscribed as shravan.mis...@gmail.com
<http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/options/pacemaker/shravan.mishra--at--gmail.com> but
are attempting to post as ssahu...@movik.net <mailto:ssahu...@movik.net>.
You need to send from the same address you subscribed with.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Shridhar Sahukar <ssahu...@movik.net
<mailto:ssahu...@movik.net>> wrote:
I did. I am getting all other emails posted on the mailing list.
So I was wondering if the list is moderated.
Regards,
Shridhar
On 01/03/2013 08:26 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Did you subscribe before sending?
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Shridhar Sahukar
<ssahu...@movik.net <mailto:ssahu...@movik.net>> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I am not sure why the following mail didn't appear on the
mailing list. Could you please help with some inputs?
Regards,
Shridhar
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Clarification on pacemaker HA services
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:37:27 -0500
From: Shridhar Sahukar <ssahu...@movik.net>
<mailto:ssahu...@movik.net>
Reply-To: ssahu...@movik.net <mailto:ssahu...@movik.net>
Organization: Movik Networks Pvt Ltd
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
<mailto:pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
Hi,
I have worked with high availability middleware like OpenSAF, OpenAIS
which are based on SAForum specifications. I have a requirement for a
similar middleware that runs on top of corosync (more specifically the
totem protocol implementation) and am considering using pacemaker
(OpenAIS was a good fit, but since it is discontinued, I am looking for
an alternative). I see that pacemaker can also support various
redundancy models, but I am not sure if it provides functionality close
to AMF functionality specified in SAForum specs.
Could you please provide some comparison of pacemaker's features against
an SAForum middleware in terms of HA support?
Regards,
Shridhar
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
