On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Shridhar Sahukar <ssahu...@movik.com>wrote:
> No. I have subscribed as ssahu...@movik.com. > Not to the pacemaker list. I checked. > But my thunderbird client is still referring to my email id as > "ssahu...@movik.net" <ssahu...@movik.net> (our domain was recently > changed from .com to .net, but my client is still referring to the old > one). I guess this could be the problem. Now I have changed the setting, so > hope this response with the list alias in cc will make it to the mailing > list. > > Regards, > Shridhar > > > On 01/09/2013 04:39 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > It seems to be because you subscribed as > shravan.mis...@gmail.com<http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/options/pacemaker/shravan.mishra--at--gmail.com> > but > are attempting to post as ssahu...@movik.net. > You need to send from the same address you subscribed with. > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Shridhar Sahukar <ssahu...@movik.net>wrote: > >> I did. I am getting all other emails posted on the mailing list. So I >> was wondering if the list is moderated. >> >> Regards, >> Shridhar >> >> >> On 01/03/2013 08:26 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> Did you subscribe before sending? >> >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Shridhar Sahukar <ssahu...@movik.net>wrote: >> >>> Hi Andrew, >>> >>> I am not sure why the following mail didn't appear on the mailing list. >>> Could you please help with some inputs? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Shridhar >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Clarification on pacemaker >>> HA services Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:37:27 -0500 From: Shridhar >>> Sahukar <ssahu...@movik.net> <ssahu...@movik.net> Reply-To: >>> ssahu...@movik.net Organization: Movik Networks Pvt Ltd To: >>> pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have worked with high availability middleware like OpenSAF, OpenAIS >>> which are based on SAForum specifications. I have a requirement for a >>> similar middleware that runs on top of corosync (more specifically the >>> totem protocol implementation) and am considering using pacemaker >>> (OpenAIS was a good fit, but since it is discontinued, I am looking for >>> an alternative). I see that pacemaker can also support various >>> redundancy models, but I am not sure if it provides functionality close >>> to AMF functionality specified in SAForum specs. >>> >>> Could you please provide some comparison of pacemaker's features against >>> an SAForum middleware in terms of HA support? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Shridhar >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
