Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #15 from Chen Lei <[email protected]> 2010-03-11 00:58:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > (In reply to comment #12) > > > Here's the updated 0.9.0 version: > > > Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib.spec > > > SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm > > > I also included some of the bin programs, but I'm wondering if it would > > > be best > > > to prepend "cbf" to them, as names like "convert_image" are a bit > > > ambiguous and > > > potentially conflicting. > > > I didn't split off -doc and -utils, I'd like to get some feedback from > > > fedora > > > review people on that. > > > > Please do not add utils to main package, it'll lead to multilib conflict. > > > How will it lead to a multilib conflict? Its fine to install both the 32 and > 64 > bit binaries and libraries and run/use either. Hi Tim, See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks#Splitting_libraries_into_separate_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
