Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #17 from Chen Lei <[email protected]> 2010-03-11 01:39:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) > Take that with a grain of salt, please. It's a draft and not a mandatory item > in the guidelines. Ordinary binary executables don't cause multilib conflicts. > Tim is right about that. > Further, there's a conditional: *If* you have a file conflict in a library > package due to other files in the same package, splitting of the libs into > their own package *may* help. Doing that doesn't prevent all multiarch > problems, though, such as conflicts in the -devel package. You are right Michael, this is not a mandatory item in reviewing a package. We should be lenient with multilib conflicts if the package mainly act as a program such as qt-creator. Howerver, the main role of CBFlib is act as a dynamic lib, the programs included in the CBFlib are only utilities. So I think we should be careful with multilib conflicts in CBFlib, it's easy to split out a -utils subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
