https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845628
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann <[email protected]> --- "This package provides header files needed for developing mine-data in Mate." Besides from you have a typo in the description (miNe-data), you should use the commonly used description for -devel packages: "This package contains development libraries and headers for the %{name} package." Doesn't matter that your package only contains a packageconfig file, and no headers or anything. It's not the purpose to describe the content in particular. %patch0 -p1 -b .librenoffice Somewhat odd that the patch is named "librenoffice". Just a cosmetic issue, but worth to fix it. Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Please change this to %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} to tell Yum to use the correct package for the appropriate architecture. Both the base and the devel package include the same docs. This is not allowed. Because the devel requires the base package, the doc files are present anyway. Remove the entries from the file list. No problem that rpmlint is unhappy with missing docs in this case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
