https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244
Jerry James <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jerry James <[email protected]> --- Since I made a hash of the original review (sorry, Mario!), the least I can do is see this one through. Things look pretty good in general. I understand that upstream is at least mostly dead, but Jussi's point in comment 3 is well taken. Shouldn't this package have a more general name? (That's why I called my version "surf-geometry".) According to http://sagemath.org/packages/experimental/, Sage is using surf version 1.1! Where did that version come from? Do you know? The conflict with the existing surf package can cause problems. Can we rename the binary in this package instead so they don't conflict? Again, I realize that this makes us nonstandard and that we can't talk to upstream about it because upstream mostly isn't there anymore, but that seems to be a better path to me. I noticed that the configure script reports that it cannot find tiffio.h, even though that file is in libtiff-devel. Do you know what's going on there? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
