https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863985

--- Comment #3 from Eduardo Echeverria <[email protected]> ---
Hi again Mathieu:
Midori suffers from the same problem with the waf version in fedora (not build
the package), therefore uses the executable of waf included,  but the question
is, it's easy for you maintain change in wscript through time with successive
versions of waf?, if the answer is positive, use the version of waf in fedora,
if not, I see no problem as there is a precedent, So be should documented in
the spec if  you use the binary included

Btw, You searched if there are manual pages for this program?


For the readers:
- Download
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/midori/0.4.7/1.fc18/src/midori-0.4.7-1.fc18.src.rpm
- Extract the spec with rpm2cpio midori-0.4.7-1.fc18.src.rpm | cpio -idmv
- Open midori.spec
Verify this
%build
export CFLAGS="%{optflags}"
## Currently does not build against Fedora waf
./waf    --prefix=%{_usr}            \
    --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}    \
    --libdir=%{_libdir}            \
    --enable-apidocs            \
    configure
./waf %{?_smp_mflags} build

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to