https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863985
--- Comment #4 from Mathieu Bridon <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hi again Mathieu: > Midori suffers from the same problem with the waf version in fedora (not > build the package), therefore uses the executable of waf included, but the > question is, it's easy for you maintain change in wscript through time with > successive versions of waf? Heh, I have absolutely no idea. The first time I heard about waf was when I started trying to build this package yesterday. :) >, if the answer is positive, use the version of > waf in fedora, if not, I see no problem as there is a precedent, So be > should documented in the spec if you use the binary included Agreed, I should definitely leave a comment about it in there. > Btw, You searched if there are manual pages for this program? There is none in the upstream source tree: http://cgit.lighttpd.net/weighttp.git/tree/ The command is quite well self-documented with the -h option though, so I'll happily include it in the package if someone else does and submits it upstream, but I won't do so myself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
