Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863145
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> --- True. I've pointed out something like that many times before, but have nearly given up doing so unless I assign a full review to myself. There are packagers who reintroduce *.gz and similar wildcards in existing packages and in new package submissions, because they don't care until the compression changes actually or until the guidelines make it a MUST item. You can also meet some who refuse to use listadmin.1* because it would include uncompressed *and* compressed files at the same time. They would then accept listadmin.1.* even if only reluctantly. ;) Though, I wouldn't call it "a major nitpick", since the compression technique hasn't changed for years. It could be, however, that someone (downstream or locally) reconfigures it, and to make the spec file more versatile (and future-proof) is added value. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FJrf6OeM8V&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
