Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking <[email protected]> 2010-05-24 14:36:54 EDT --- I agree, 1) is not an option here. The best variant would be a corporative upstream developer. If he can't be convinced to add the patch, the cleanest way would probably be a fork of the library. This leads to additional work, though. I think, Fedora shouldn't provide a shared library with an updated interface that differs from upstream. However, I'm not sure about this. Maybe you can ask on the devel or packaging list for further suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
