Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #14 from Chen Lei <[email protected]> 2010-05-25 09:08:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > The License should be LGPLv2+, license field is for binary not for source. > > > Incorrect. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Combined_Dual_and_Multiple_Licensing_Scenario > The license of the file is "compiled" into the library and thus part of the > binary. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License:_field LGPLv2+ + Public domain = LGPLv2+, because LGPLv2+ contains all limitation Public domain Yesterday, someone confirmed this with spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
