https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060920
--- Comment #7 from Scott K Logan <[email protected]> --- Christopher - Are you saying that the package should be renamed to OpenNI2? So: OpenNI2 OpenNI2-devel OpenNI2-doc OpenNI2-examples OpenNI2-java ...would be the package names. If this is what you'd like to see, is there a reason that the openni package isn't named similarly? Do you think it would cause confusion if they were named differently like this? Thanks, --scott -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
