https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060910

Jakub Hrozek <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Jakub Hrozek <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Jakub Hrozek from comment #3)
> Issues:
> =======
> - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
>   Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
>   See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages

Sorry, I didn't add a comment properly. As discussed in bug #1060909, this is
probably the best way to go and allow the preloading (which is the point of the
wrappers) easily.

I short, I don't have any issues with the package. It's very similar to
socket_wrapper which already passed a review, so it went quite smooth.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to