https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078472
Jamie Nguyen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > It seems that the LICENSE file should be removed For Node.js modules that do not provide a copy of the license text, and whose upstreams have been unresponsive or unwilling to include a copy, I have been including the MIT (or BSD) license text within the RPM as suggested by these guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text "However, in situations where upstream is unresponsive, unable, or unwilling to provide proper full license text as part of the source code, and the indicated license requires that the full license text be included, Fedora Packagers must either: - Include a copy of what they believe the license text is intended to be, as part of the Fedora package in %doc, in order to remain in compliance." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
