https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078472
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jamie Nguyen from comment #2) > (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > > It seems that the LICENSE file should be removed > > For Node.js modules that do not provide a copy of the license text, and > whose upstreams have been unresponsive or unwilling to include a copy, I > have been including the MIT (or BSD) license text within the RPM as > suggested by these guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text Oh, OK. I forgot that. So please disregard the same comment in the other two or three reviews :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
