https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094864
--- Comment #7 from Remi Collet <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #6) > >- filtering private is no more needed in f20+ (and rhel7) > Obviously i've missing something. Where it stated? Meantime if it is not > targeted to El5 i'm prefer leave it for Fedora 19. You can conditionalize it (which make easier to detect when could be dropped) %if 0%{?fedora} < 20 && 0%{?rhel} < 7 > > >- why don't you provide the -devel sub package ? (with the installed header, > >and perhaps the upstream test suite... useful as documentation) > I don't know anything which may use it, do you? Is it have worth at all? I don't know anything which use it yet. I'm used to follow upstream desing. But will be easy to fix if needed later... Your choice. > mv {CREDITS,LICENSE} ./%{pecl_docdir}/ > %doc %peclName-%{version}/%{pecl_docdir}/{CREDITS,LICENSE} This result as /usr/share/doc/php-pecl-xmldiff /usr/share/doc/php-pecl-xmldiff/CREDITS /usr/share/doc/php-pecl-xmldiff/LICENSE While expected is (check: "pecl list xmldiff") /usr/share/doc/pecl/xmldiff /usr/share/doc/pecl/xmldiff/CREDITS /usr/share/doc/pecl/xmldiff/LICENSE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
