Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569671 Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> 2010-06-21 08:34:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Hi Fabian, > > since using Conflicts should be avoided in Fedora packages, I suggest to move > the library (and its symlinks) to a subdirectory of %{_libdir}, e.g. > %{_libdir}/elliptics/, as long as the conflict persists. In this case, you > also > have to add a file elliptics-%{_arch}.conf to /etc/ld.so.conf.d containing the > directory where the library is located. > Nonetheless, it would be much better if upstream renamed the library. I hope the library function names don't clash with those in libdnet, since otherwise also this is asking for trouble. Upstream should rename the tarball to 'elliptics'. However, until that happens this review has the wrong name, as per Fedora naming guidelines. The correct package name would be, of course, dnet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
