https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #14 from Pierre-YvesChibon <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #11) > (In reply to David Parsons from comment #10) > > However, if EPEL5 is still being used, I suppose it would be best to > > support it and hence keep the "rm -rf %{buildroot}" statement in the > > %install section. > IMO, it's much easier, cleaner and less error-prone to remove all legacy rpm > stuff from Fedora rpms and re-add it if necessary on the corresponding > branches in git. I only partly agree with this, I prefer to review the most complete spec file even if things are later cleaned in git. So if David wants to support EL5, basically I prefer to review the EL5 spec since it will be Fedora compatible anyway... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
