https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172719
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> --- [relinking with -lgmp] > True, but it also shouldn't hurt. It can lead to extra rebuilds, e.g. you would need to rebuild anything that links with -lisl, if only GMP bumped its SONAME. Being aware of that can be helpful. Often the pkgconfig files are tailored for static linking. > I'm not sure what I can do about that without modifying the gmp package. The added "Requires: gmp-devel" is almost the right fix. You really want "Requires: gpm-devel%{?_isa}" to get the correct build-arch. > I have a line that supposedly removes that in the spec file and > I don't see it when I build the RPMs. The added lines are the right fix. Note that "rm -f" would be better, because unlike "rm" it would not make the build fail, if the file to be removed does not exist. => You want to get rid of the file anyway, so if it doesn't exist that's fine. > Did you mean %make_install instead? Yes. The macro saves some typing, but it's not a MUST. You've not fixed/removed the Group tag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
