https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?([email protected] | |m) | |needinfo?(bugs.michael@gmx. | |net) | --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> --- Directory ownership has been corrected after comment 7 (bottom). My question in comment 11 is based on the fact that vdsm places safelease in a different directory. It does not know about the new location chosen by this package. Unless it will be patched to look there. That's why I want to know what is the plan? > Vitor, why don't we install safelease in the same location > (%{_libexecdir}/%{vdsm_name}/safelease) and sign the package > as Obsolote vdsm ** It certainly must not obsolete vdsm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
