https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262552
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #6) > ok. I created the python2 subpackage. > > Can you explain how run.sh in Tests is broken? It worked fine here, but note > (as per the comment in the spec file) it's commented out because you have to > have a YubiHSM to test against. $ /usr/share/doc/python2-pyhsm/Tests/run.sh python: can't open file '/usr/share/doc/python2-pyhsm/Tests/../setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory It also refers to ../Lib, which is not in the package at all. > Is there a guideline saying to replace all /usr/bin/env calls? I agree it's > not great, but I would prefer to ask upstream to change that instead of > carrying some large patch. Some executables in the package in /usr/bin/ have /usr/bin/env python, others have /usr/bin/python. This is kind of inelegant. Also there's bigger chance of running a user-installed python by mistake. Changing it to /usr/bin/python2 everywhere makes things crystal clear. I don't think that there's an official guideline, but I think it's generally recommended. > Spec URL: > https://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/review/python-pyhsm/python-pyhsm.spec > SRPM URL: > https://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/review/python-pyhsm/python-pyhsm-1.0.4l- > 3.fc24.src.rpm OK, please fix (or not) the two small issues pointed out above as you see fit. Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
