https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289070
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #9) > * Appdata is should, not must and I don't make it blocker when I review > others. Yes. It's a should. So far I haven't heard any reasons to not provide it. In case of an application for non-technical users like a ebook viewer appdata is particularly useful. > * I may try updating %description, however I would appreciate if you would > point out other points Looks good otherwise. > * And again if any I can offer review swap. Thank you. I don't have any outstanding packages, but you can always grab one from http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
