Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620385 --- Comment #4 from Adam Huffman <[email protected]> 2010-08-31 06:45:04 EDT --- Martin, Thanks for taking a look. New version addressing your comments is at: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/BEDTools/BEDTools.spec http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/BEDTools/BEDTools-2.9.0-2.fc13.src.rpm I've contacted upstream about the library bundling. So far as I can see, it's not actually referred to in any of the individual Makefiles. There is an extra warning from rpmlint now, relating to the removal of the curl directory: BEDTools.src:32: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf %{buildroot}/src/utils/curl $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it may break short circuit builds. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Here are the warnings for the binary packages: BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary complementBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary genomeCoverageBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mergeBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pairToPair Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary groupBy Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fastaFromBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary slopBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bedToIgv Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary overlap Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary subtractBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bamToBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary intersectBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary maskFastaFromBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bed12ToBed6 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bedToBam Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary unionBedGraphs Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sortBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary windowBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary closestBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary linksBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary shuffleBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary coverageBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. BEDTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pairToBed Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 23 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
