https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372718



--- Comment #19 from Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Pavel Valena from comment #2)
> *** build.log errors
>  * In %build section there is
> ```
> To see why this extension failed to compile, please check the mkmf.log which
> can be found here:
>   /builddir/build/BUILD/puma-3.6.0/usr/lib64/gems/ruby/puma-3.6.0/mkmf.log
> ```
> But the .so is packaged. Is this false positive?
> 
>  * In %install section:
> ```
> cpio:
> puma-3.6.0/usr/share/gems/gems/puma-3.6.0/ext/puma_http11/ext/puma_http11/
> http11_parser.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
> cpio:
> puma-3.6.0/usr/share/gems/gems/puma-3.6.0/ext/puma_http11/ext/puma_http11/
> http11_parser.rl: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
> ```
> Is this also false positive?

Just for the record, this is very likely RubyGems issue and it is definitely
false positive. More over, the "please check the mkmf.log" is just misleading
... But I never bothered to investigate what is the real cause here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to