https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047



--- Comment #26 from Tomas Mraz <tm...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to lo1 from comment #24)
> The developer has been using nonstandard variables such as LNFLAGS (as
> opposed to LDFLAGS) and CCFLAGS (for CFLAGS) etc.  There were other compile
> flags such as CCLFLAGS for compiling library and CCAFLAGS for compiling
> application.
> 
> Would that be OK to keep the naming of those nonstandard variables, while
> I'm making sure that the build includes hardending and optimalization with
> the RPM_OPT_FLAGS?

Yes, that should not be problem. However please also ensure that LDFLAGS set by
rpm build environment are applied when linking the binaries and library.

> I've fixed all warnings except for the "tss2-devel.x86_64: W: 
> only-non-binary-in-usr-lib".  Can this warning be ignored?

Yes, this can be ignored.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to