https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo <[email protected]> --- Issues: [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 27 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1379094-python-flit/licensecheck.txt flit-0.9/flit/logo.py under ASL 2.0 license flit-0.9/flit/upload.py under PSF license Most of the sources file are devoid of this information. Please, contact upstream and ask to confirm the licensing of code and/or content/s, and add license headers https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. flit-0.9/flit/logo.py flit-0.9/flit/upload.py Please, add: "Provides: bundled(foo) = fooversion" NON bloccking issues: [!]: Latest version is packaged. Available: 0.9 Please, fix also these rpmlint problem: python3-flit.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subpackages -> sub packages, sub-packages, prepackages python3-flit.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary flit python-flit.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subpackages -> sub packages, sub-packages, prepackages python-flit.src:35: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 35, tab: line 9) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
