https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2) > > Issues: > > > > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > > found: "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Apache (v2.0)", > > "Unknown or generated". 27 files have unknown license. Detailed output > > of licensecheck in /home/gil/1379094-python-flit/licensecheck.txt > > > > flit-0.9/flit/logo.py under ASL 2.0 license > > flit-0.9/flit/upload.py under PSF license > > Most of the sources file are devoid of this information. > > Please, contact upstream and ask to confirm the licensing of code and/or > > content/s, and add license headers > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/ > > LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification > > > > [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. > > flit-0.9/flit/logo.py > > flit-0.9/flit/upload.py > > Please, add: "Provides: bundled(foo) = fooversion" > > e.g. # https://pypi.python.org/pypi/tornado # ./flit/logo.py Provides: bundled(python-tornado) = ...? # ./flit/upload.py Provides: bundled(python?) = ...? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
