https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwiz...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(kwiz...@gmail.com |
|) |
--- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwiz...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10)
> > - You are missing a "-" between email and package EVR in changelog. rpmlint
> > haven't found it and I don't expect it's a hard requirement. But at least
> > that the format used by the rpmdev-bumpspec tool
>
> I dont want use "-" in my spec file, and i am not interested to use that tool
It's a weird answer. I wouldn't have expected it.
The problem is that other maintainers and provenpackager will use theses tools,
or even use parser that may break if the "-" isn't found.
Above all it's improving readability.
> > - What the point to use /usr/bin/perl over perl (as package) directly ? or
> > at least the appropriate macro ?
>
> I need only the binary for change the build scripts ...
okay, but %{_bindir} should be used here why not using the macro ?
Also I don't think perl packaging will change it's packaging scheme not to have
the perl binary in the main perl package.
That been said, I would use sed (that is in the default buildroot) instead to
avoid a dependency on perl (that is no more in the default buildroot).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
