https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #13) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10) > > > > - You are missing a "-" between email and package EVR in changelog. > > > rpmlint > > > haven't found it and I don't expect it's a hard requirement. But at least > > > that the format used by the rpmdev-bumpspec tool > > > > I dont want use "-" in my spec file, and i am not interested to use that > > tool > > It's a weird answer. I wouldn't have expected it. > The problem is that other maintainers and provenpackager will use theses > tools, or even use parser that may break if the "-" isn't found. > Above all it's improving readability. NOT is a problem, this is because the people you've indicated you have no problems to make changes in my spec files. and I repeat I am not interested just about aesthetics without any functionality > > > - What the point to use /usr/bin/perl over perl (as package) directly ? or > > > at least the appropriate macro ? > > > > I need only the binary for change the build scripts ... > okay, but %{_bindir} should be used here why not using the macro ? > Also I don't think perl packaging will change it's packaging scheme not to > have the perl binary in the main perl package. Done > That been said, I would use sed (that is in the default buildroot) instead > to avoid a dependency on perl (that is no more in the default buildroot). Not in my spec file, unless it is forbidden to use in some guideline Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/ecc-25519-java.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/ecc-25519-java-1.0.3-1.fc24.src.rpm - use "%{_bindir}" macro -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
