https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394788
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Hrozek <[email protected]> --- fedora-review complains: Issues: ======= - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file LICENSE-MIT is not marked as %license See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text so please change: %doc LICENSE-MIT README.md to: %license LICENSE-MIT %doc README.md otherwise looks good to me -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
