https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411984
--- Comment #9 from Kees de Jong <keesdejong+b...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Dylan Araps from comment #8) > Every other dependency is optional and neofetch will just not display > information for that function if a program is missing. What I propose for > your package is making `bash` the only required dependency. Right now this > spec file makes neofetch have an indirect dependency on the X server. > > Neofetch 3.0 was released yesterday which introduced the POSIX Makefile so > it *should* work without modification on your side now. Hi Dylan, Thank you for the suggestions! I indeed list a lot of dependencies because I'm discussing these things in IRC to figure out what's the best way to do this. I changed it to 'Suggests' in the spec file for everything except bash. RPM and the DNF depsolver will totally ignore this, in a future release these weak dependencies will be listed as optional. That way people can use that (in the future when DNF supports it) as a reference if not all functionality of the command switches are available. I will discuss this change as well on IRC and I'll create a test branch in git for my experimental suggestions so they won't show up in this ticket :-) I bumped the spec and SRPM to version 3.0 in the master branch and also did a scratch build on Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17399343 Later this week I expect to have some final draft for this, I still have to read some packaging docs as well. Stay tuned :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
