https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #19 from Matthew Miller <[email protected]> --- Given comment #1: > There are two reasons for including a package in -ugly: 1) license of > included code or dependent library is "stronger" than LGPL (usually GPL), > and/or 2) software patents. The former should still be acceptable for > Fedora; as mentioned above, there are already other GPL plugins in -bad-free. ... I don't think we really want a package called "-ugly" in Fedora. If the plugin _formerly_ was in category 2 but is cleared and is GPL, shouldn't it be just moved to -good or -base? If it's in category 1, maybe something like -non-lgpl (or -gpl, if that's what they all actually are), rather than "ugly"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
