Robert-André Mauchin <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin <> ---
It's all good to me, except I can't verify it builds on all architectures on
Koji because the dependencies are not yet available in rawhide. Could you build
the packages that already have been accepted?

===== MUST items =====

[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 700 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/dbus-1,
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
     contains icons.
     Note: icons in deepin-session-ui
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in deepin-
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

Checking: deepin-session-ui-4.0.13-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dde -> dd,
dded, dude
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lockservice
-> lock service, lock-service, serviceable
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
switchtogreeter -> switcher
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lowpower ->
low power, low-power, Lowery
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US osd -> sod,
odd, dos
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hotzone ->
hot zone, hot-zone, honeypot
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dde-lock
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dde-shutdown
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dde-switchtogreeter
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dde-wm-chooser
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lightdm-deepin-greeter
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile
/usr/share/applications/deepin-toggle-desktop.desktop value "Deepin;" for key
"OnlyShowIn" in group "Desktop Entry" contains an unregistered value "Deepin";
values extending the format should start with "X-"
deepin-session-ui.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary
deepin-session-ui.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dde -> dd, dded,
deepin-session-ui.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lockservice ->
lock service, lock-service, serviceable
deepin-session-ui.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lightdm -> light
deepin-session-ui.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US switchtogreeter
-> switcher
deepin-session-ui.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lowpower -> low
power, low-power, Lowery
deepin-session-ui.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US osd -> sod, odd,
deepin-session-ui.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hotzone -> hot
zone, hot-zone, honeypot
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 20 warnings.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
package-review mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to

Reply via email to