Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641188

Parag AN(पराग) <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
         AssignedTo|[email protected]    |[email protected]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <[email protected]> 2010-10-12 03:33:02 EDT 
---
Suggestions:-

1) I see this package includes versioned BuildRequires. Can you add some
comments why is it needed to have versioned BR: ? 
   I think as we used to first build required build dependencies in required
release, there should not be any need to write versions.

2) For usage of obsoletes and provides see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F

this package added
Obsoletes:      gnome-applets-devel < 1:2.21.4-1

but I see gnome-applets-devel-2.21.4-1 was built for FC9. So, this obsolete is
not needed.

3) Is there any bug reference for Patch0: ?

4) Please we have got updated Gconf2 scriptlet snippet. Good to use that. See 

5) Any reason to turn off verbose output in %posttrans?

What does gtkdocize do?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to