https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955
--- Comment #10 from Alec Leamas <[email protected]> --- Some follow-up from another box: The bundled headers are iostream_bgzf.h, iostream_bzip2.h, iostream_bzip2_impl.h, iostream_zip.h and iostream_zip_impl.h. I assume this is bundled code from https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/4457/zipstream-bzip-stream-iostream-wrappers-for-the-zl As for licensing, yy bad gut feeling about a single license is actually perfectly right. Reading the reference I see this: "If your package contains files which are under multiple, distinct, and independent licenses, then the spec must reflect this by using "and" as a separator" So, even if I understand your way of reasoning, a single license is not applicable here. You need to declare all licenses present in the code using AND. Removing unused stuff such as the SIL-licensed font in %prep could simplify this. Also note the GL on break-down: "In addition, the package must contain a comment explaining the multiple licensing breakdown". Which is what I have been trying to explain. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
