https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522



--- Comment #65 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <domi...@greysector.net> ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #61)
[...]
> The problem is that the third-party repository was previously shipping a
> different codec, the built-in one from FFmpeg, as the default, with nicer
> licensing and better FFmpeg integration. Now they'll have to deal with
> fdk-aac just because Fedora decided to ship a crippled version of it. And
> they'll have to do an fdk-aac-freeworld override without a real need for it.
> 
> And the other problem is that the decoder Fedora is going to ship silently
> produces wrong sound for some input files! That fits my definition of a
> broken decoder exactly.

I already said that and both Wim and FESCo said they're fine with that. There's
no need to repeat things ad nauseam.

> (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #60)
> > (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #57)
> > > We still don't know the outcome of comment #52 (license review by the 
> > > FSF).
> > 
> > That's irrelevant. RH legal already cleared it.
> 
> So you would be happy to ship something the FSF considers non-free?

I wouldn't, but FSF hasn't spoken on this matter yet, as far as I know. Can you
provide a link to a public statement by FSF saying otherwise? I don't see the
FDK AAC license on https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html and I trust
spot's opinion that it's unlikely they will consider it non-free.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to