https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829



--- Comment #11 from Stefan Berger <[email protected]> ---
The latest spec is now here again:

https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm/blob/tpm2-preview.v2.selinux/dist/swtpm.spec

I removed the remaining 'Group' line, added details about how to get Source0,
fixed the changelog entry to have my email and replace the AC_PROG_LIBTOOL with
LT_INIT.

I also removed the cuse conditional. I would like to keep the gnutls one. The
rpmlint is down to this list here. I wasn't sure what to do about the
no-documentation warning for the subpackages, so duplicated the %doc to all of
them.

]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/swtpm-*.rpm
~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/swtpm-0.1.0-0.20180918gitbe6b378487.fc28.src.rpm
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/swtpm-selinux-0.1.0-0.20180918gitbe6b378487.fc28.noarch.rpm
swtpm-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libtpms -> libations
swtpm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libtpms -> libations
swtpm.src: W: invalid-url Source0: swtpm-0.1.0.tar.gz
swtpm-selinux.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libselinux-utils
swtpm-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%posttrans rm
10 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.

Do I have to have a URL to the tar? In Fedora I will check the tar into the
fedpkg repo and it will pick it up from there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to