https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #17 from Marc-Andre Lureau <[email protected]> --- - remove the duplicated "License: BSD" lines, the top-level one is enough - no need to duplicate %doc & %license for each pacakge - use regular section order, %files come just before %changelog (thanks!) - since the package builds with python3, why not BR python3 and remove BR python2-twisted? - %post -> %post selinux ? Why do you make it a seperate (required) -selinux package, and not include the policy in swtpm package directly? What is the status of selinux policy review ? - I suggest to remove the top-level comment: # --- swtpm rpm-spec --- - dist'ing libswtpm_libtpms.so in -devel isn't useful if you don't provide a header & stable API to use it. - it is a good idea to add a link to this BZ in the changelog my attempt so far: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/zkHXboAJJnggRwMUo0dBlA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
