https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829



--- Comment #23 from Stefan Berger <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #17)
> - remove the duplicated "License: BSD" lines, the top-level one is enough

Actually added a license to the -devel package.
> 
> - use regular section order, %files come just before %changelog (thanks!)

Fixed.

> 
> - since the package builds with python3, why not BR python3 and remove BR
> python2-twisted?
> 
> - %post -> %post selinux ?

Dropped selinux package.

> 
>   Why do you make it a seperate (required) -selinux package, and not include
> the policy in swtpm package directly?
> 
>   What is the status of selinux policy review ?

Haven't heared back from Lukas.

> 
> - I suggest to remove the top-level comment: # --- swtpm rpm-spec ---

Done.
> 
> - dist'ing libswtpm_libtpms.so in -devel isn't useful if you don't provide a
> header & stable API to use it.
> 
> - it is a good idea to add a link to this BZ in the changelog
> 

Done. And pushed the update.

> 
> my attempt so far:
> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/zkHXboAJJnggRwMUo0dBlA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to