https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Bauer <[email protected]> --- Well that's interesting. That sure does evaluate to true on Fedora. Despite that, I am able to install the netatalk package on my system because /usr/sbin/ldconfig still exists on the filesystem, even though no package provides it. Chalk that up to multiple Fedora upgrades over the years, I guess. > $ ls -lh /usr/sbin/ldconfig > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.2M Dec 13 18:58 /usr/sbin/ldconfig > $ dnf whatprovides /usr/sbin/ldconfig > Last metadata expiration check: 1 day, 20:40:27 ago on Sun 03 Feb 2019 > 11:35:09 AM CST. > Error: No Matches found This dependency has been fixed the latest netatalk build. Fedora: > $ rpm -qpR netatalk-3.1.12-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm |grep ldconfig > $ Rhel: > $ rpm -qpR netatalk-3.1.12-2.el7.x86_64.rpm |grep ldconfig > /usr/sbin/ldconfig I may have to re-evaluate that macro again when rhel 8 is released. I do not know at this time whether rhel 8 will require ldconfig or not, but I will deal with that when the time comes. Updated SPEC URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/knight-of-ni/specfiles/master/netatalk.spec Update Source RPM: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3501/32553501/netatalk-3.1.12-2.fc30.x86_64.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
