https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690046
--- Comment #35 from [email protected] --- Aha! OK, I understand what you are saying now. It appears that our needed fonts, css, and js bits get installed to /usr/lib/$python/site-packages/sphinx_rtd_theme/static/{fonts, css, js (respectively) } when the -doc package dependencies are installed. I can remove our duplicate bundled versions, e.g., doc/_static/fonts, doc/_static/css, and doc/_static/js, and replace them with symlinks to the packaged versions at /usr/lib/$python/site-packages/sphinx_rtd_theme/static/{fonts, css, js} at %build or %install time. Note the html files work perfectly with the symlinks. Would this, in addition to adding the BSD and MIT license to -doc be sufficient? The other files in doc are unique to our package (i.e., generated with sphinx); would we still need the virtual provides? Best, Jordan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
