https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813



--- Comment #12 from Sergio Monteiro Basto <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #11)
> (In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #10)
> >
> > Also as per the guidelines I think we should follow upstream (sub)packaging
> > as prior art:
> > 
> > - apt-libs: split into libapt-pkg and libapt-inst

We don't need follow Debian packing way in fedora we don't use libfoo we use
foo-libs , specially if main program is a executable not a library.


> The splitting is unnecessary. Moreover, libapt-inst is gone now.
> 
> > - libapt-pkg: make it provide libapt-pkg%{soname}
> 
> What would be the point? I can do it, but the generated library Provides are
> what we usually rely on for this...
> 
> > - libapt-inst: make it provide libapt-inst%{soname}
> 
> This library is gone.
> 
> > - apt-devel: rename to libapt-pkg-devel
> > - apt-devel-doc: rename to libapt-pkg-doc
> > 
> 
> I'm not going to do this. People should not rely on package names like this
> when building against it. Instead, they should rely on pkgconfig() / cmake()
> Provides that RPM generates. That said, I already include those names as
> Provides for the subpackages in question.

libapt-pkg-devel, libapt-pkg-doc is debian names , apt-devel and apt-devel-doc
are the correct name 

Also URL https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/apt is must better than
https://packages.debian.org/source/buster/apt 


By packing guidelines the old apt should be retired and should be already
retired a long time ago and package should be orphan. 
After we should do package review as we did here and request the package again
a simple releng ticket. 

The package review was approve and is ready to be imported.

Also fedora-package-config-apt should be retired and not be a zombie on stable
releases.

In my opinion , we should avoid splitting packages in many sub-packages without
a good reason

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to