https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686



--- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani <manisan...@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 1691203
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1691203&action=edit
PDAL.spec

Attached a spec with some fixes:

- Correctly unbundle eigen3 and gtest
- Correctly build and run tests
- Actually build docs instead of packaging the sources
- Fix provides_excludes_from
- Move unversioned so libraries to -devel

Open issues:

- The library versioning adopted by PDAL is pretty unusual, i.e. in
CMakeLists.txt

set(PDAL_API_VERSION "10")
set(PDAL_BUILD_VERSION "11")

[...]

set_target_properties(${PDAL_BASE_LIB_NAME} PROPERTIES
    VERSION ${PDAL_BUILD_VERSION}
    SOVERSION ${PDAL_API_VERSION}
    CLEAN_DIRECT_OUTPUT 1)

You'd rather expect something like

set(PDAL_API_MAJ_VERSION "10")
set(PDAL_API_MIN_VERSION "X")

[...]

set_target_properties(${PDAL_BASE_LIB_NAME} PROPERTIES
    VERSION ${PDAL_API_MAJ_VERSION}.${PDAL_API_MIN_VERSION}.0
    SOVERSION ${PDAL_API_MAJ_VERSION}
    CLEAN_DIRECT_OUTPUT 1)

Don't think this is actually a blocker for the review, but might be interesting
to understand what upstream intends to achieve by using this versioning. I
suspect that they are building on Windows and may not be familiar with SO
versioning.


- PDAL-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpdal_base.so.11
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5

You should report this upstream, a shared library should never call exit, as
this will result in an application using the library to quit if the respective
condition is met (rather, the library should notify the application about this
condition, say via exceptions or some error handler mechanism, so that the
application can then choose how to proceed).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to