https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884



--- Comment #38 from Brandon Nielsen <niels...@jetfuse.net> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #37)
> (In reply to Brandon Nielsen from comment #36)
[Snip]
> > One final question, do I need to run add a check step? They used to not
> > work, but I think they do now.
> 
> I'm not sure what you're referring to, %check steps have always worked as
> far as I know.
> 
> It's probably a good idea to add one. Maybe just compile and link a "hello,
> world" program as a sanity check. You won't be able to run it of course.

That was poorly worded. I used to never be able to get 'make check' to do more
than produce a bunch of failures, no matter how I built the upstream sources.
It seems to have started working at some point. I'll add the corresponding
%check step to the specfile.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to