https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884
--- Comment #40 from Brandon Nielsen <[email protected]> --- Not to wear out my welcome, I have most of the changes above squared away and tested, just trying to figure out why I need to compile programs with the -B flag mentioned above. Not a huge deal, but feels wrong. In the interim, it was suggested on the devel mailing list[0] that this could instead be built with the cross-gcc[1] and cross-binutils[2] packages. Doing this and having a useful (for embedded development) compiler at the end requires a matching newlib package, as is done for arm[3]. I've mocked all of this up, and while building it is super confusing, it does work. Would that be a better path forward? Do I run it up the flagpole on the devel mailing list? Somewhere else? [0] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/KAYAKXOY7ZPQEENB6PUM2EEUN53X2HQQ/ [1] - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cross-gcc [2] - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cross-binutils [3] - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/arm-none-eabi-newlib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
