https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #8 from Andy Mender <andymenderu...@gmail.com> --- > It's not mandatory, but I can reformat if you think it makes a difference. It would improve maintainability. Appreciated! > Indeed they do. This is > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_rpath_for_internal_libraries > . However, I made the path relative to $ORIGIN (== where the binary is physically present in the file system) so that tests run correctly during %check with the binaries in %{buildroot}. Thanks for the link. I agree with your approach. Other than that, the package looks good already. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
